Piece
See C 202/224/1 - C 202/224/26
Catalogue reference: C 202/224
See C 202/224/1 - C 202/224/26
Piece
Catalogue reference: C 202/258/3
This record is about the Devon - Allen v Westlake, Arundel v Wotton, Bartlett v Browne, Bate v Rattenbury,... dating from 1738 in the series Chancery: Petty Bag Office: Writ Files. It is held at The National Archives, Kew.
No, this record is not available online. However, you can order a copy. Other ways to view it.
Yes, this record is held at The National Archives and is available to see in person. How to view it.
Devon - Allen v Westlake, Arundel v Wotton, Bartlett v Browne, Bate v Rattenbury, Bennett v Haskins, Carslake v Cogan, Carter v Hitchcocke, Cole v Cole, Collings v Croote, Crosse v Hillman, Dannell v Manning, Dannell v Manning, Davey v Osmond, Drake v Sowthatt, Edwards v Palmer, Elliott v Elworthy, Frost v Wescombe, Goodright v Tucker, Goodright v Woodley, Goodtitle v Hamond, Goodtitle v Tapper, Hopewell v Somers, Langham v Courton, Latey v Kingdon, Leigh v Hutchings, Loaring v Purslake, Mapounder v Rowdon, Mardon v Doidge, Melhuish v Painter, Michlemore v Wotton, Northcott v Bidwell, Reep v Gill, Salkeld v Sheppard, Trickey v Addicott, Vellacott v Webber, Vyvyan v Oates, Westren v Handford, Williams v Palmer; Dorset - Grant v Smith, Lush v Trim, Perry v Batt, Woodby v Batt.
C 202
See the series level description for more information about this record.
Devon - Allen v Westlake, Arundel v Wotton, Bartlett v Browne, Bate v Rattenbury,...
Records that share similar topics with this record.