Piece
See C 202/224/1 - C 202/224/26
Catalogue reference: C 202/224
See C 202/224/1 - C 202/224/26
Piece
Catalogue reference: C 202/258/2
This record is about the Cumberland - Banks and anor. v Birkett, Bankes and anor. v Birkett, Baynes v Lutwidge,... dating from 1738 in the series Chancery: Petty Bag Office: Writ Files. It is held at The National Archives, Kew.
No, this record is not available online. However, you can order a copy. Other ways to view it.
Yes, this record is held at The National Archives and is available to see in person. How to view it.
Cumberland - Banks and anor. v Birkett, Bankes and anor. v Birkett, Baynes v Lutwidge, Baynes v Lutwidge, Bell v Scaife, Blain v Twentyman, Boyd v Robinson, Carlile v Jackson, Clarke v Dowson, Coulthard v Hodgson, Coulthard v Lowry, Dickman v Studholme, Dixon v Armstrong, Elwood v Toppin, Gibbins v Mattinson, Goodtille v Smithson, Goodright v Parkin, Horsley v Fryer, Jackson v Fisher, Lowther v Blenkinship, Lumley v Williamson, Lutwidge v Eames, Machudson v Thomlinson, Miller v Sim, Moffett v Armestrong, Myres v Benson, Myres v Benson, Pearson v Pearson, Pearson v Pearson, Petty v Creighton, Ponsonby v Beeby, Richardson v Patton, Sanderson v Sanderson, Sherwen v Dixon, Sim v Miller, Stainton v Hayton, Tinlinson v Wise, Vaux v Askew, Vaux v Askew, Williamson v Bowes.
C 202
See the series level description for more information about this record.
Cumberland - Banks and anor. v Birkett, Bankes and anor. v Birkett, Baynes v Lutwidge,...
Records that share similar topics with this record.