Match making
In the 1880s the Bryant & May match factory was one of the most significant employers in London’s East End. Several thousand people worked in an imposing building that covered acres of land in Bow.
The match-making trade was booming – matches were key to lighting the nation's homes and providing warmth. It was also a significant export business and important to the economy.
At the time it was not uncommon for children to work in factories. In areas of extreme poverty, everyone in the family was needed to add to the household income. At Bryant & May girls and boys as young as 14 were regularly employed. Casual and sweated labour, marked by irregular work and poor conditions, was common.
‘Matchgirls’ is a term used to refer to women and teenage girls who did various jobs in the factory, including dipping, wrapping, cutting down and boxing matches.
Factory conditions
The factory conditions were notoriously awful. Bryant & May had a monopoly on the market and were therefore able to get away with bad pay and conditions.
On top of long hours and poor pay was a system for docking wages. Matchgirls would be fined at the discretion of the factory foremen, for example if their feet were dirty or for an untidy workbench. There were even some fines for talking. This was a common but controversial practice, as various observations from factory inspectors across the country show.
The authorities were aware of this at Bryant & May, and records indicate they considered whether this breached the Truck Acts. This legislation aimed to protect workers’ pay – ensuring it was the full agreed amount and not subject to conditions. An amendment in 1887 extended the act to cover more workers.
Phossy jaw
The factory conditions at Bryant & May were also dangerous, due to exposure to white (also called yellow) phosphorous. White phosphorous was used to make popular lucifer matches, which were easier to light than safety matches. The fumes were poisonous and workers could develop phosphorus necrosis of the jaw. Known as ‘phossy jaw’, the disease affected the teeth, gums, face and could cause brain damage.
An article from 1898 in The Daily Chronical described phosphorus poisoning as ‘one of the most terrible and painful diseases to which the workers are subject.’ The various roles of matchgirls meant they regularly interacted with these harmful chemicals. A report from 1893 noted ‘Insufficient food’ meant workers were less nourished and therefore had a ‘small power of resistance’ to fight off the disease. Poor dental hygiene among the working class also made them more vulnerable. A report covering 1882 to 1897 documented that the mortality rate in cases of phossy jaw at Bryant & May was 19.15% – almost one in five.
By this time there was some regulation under the Factory Act 1878, but it was very limited compared to the provisions in other countries. The practice of using white phosphorus was becoming increasingly controversial, especially as red phosphorous did not have the same horrific impact, but could be used to make safety matches.
Annie Bessant
The Fabian Society were one of the groups concerned about the conditions and pay at Bryant & May, particularly in light of significant shareholder profits. One of the advocates for the matchgirls was socialist, Fabian and theosophist Annie Besant (1847–1933), described on the 1881 census as a political author.
Bessant decided to speak directly to the affected workers, obtaining details of their wages, working conditions and fines. The result was an article entitled ‘White slavery in London’, through which she exposed the shocking conditions the matchgirls were subject to. The title of the article was deliberately sensationalist to attract attention. It is now a very problematic title – these women were low paid and poorly treated, but not enslaved.
Bessant’s article shows her primary aim was a boycott of Bryant & May. It also tried to provoke libel action – essentially meaning Bryant & May would have to disprove the statements made. Instead, inspired by the article and the harsh reality of the conditions they faced, the matchgirls took their own decisive action.
The strike
Management at Bryant & May pressured the women workers to contradict what Bessant had published, but they refused. The factory management sacked or gave very minimal work to several matchgirls seen as being involved.
In response 1400 women walked out of work, and a few days later the whole factory had ground to a halt. The factory managers reinstated the sacked employee, but the matchgirls used their power to negotiate on other issues affecting them in the workplace, most significantly the fining system.
Sarah Chapman (1862–1945) was one of the known strike leaders. The census shows she was a match-making machinist from at least the age of 19, along with her mother and sister.
The Home Office were clearly concerned about these developments, as seen through their Registers of Daily Correspondence, which note the matchgirl strike. Unfortunately, the original letters do not appear to survive.
In Parliament Charles Bradlaugh advocated for the workers. Mass meetings were held, marches made to Parliament and funds raised in support of the strikers. Eventually, the workers’ immediate demands concerning the sacked of employee and docking of pay were won and the strike ended.
After the 1888 strike, the Union of Women Match Workers was formed, with Bessant as Secretary. Strike leader Chapman was elected to the committee and made President.
New Unionism
The 1888 matchgirls' strike was a powerful example of the impact workers could have by withdrawing their labour. This was one of the first times a union of so-called ‘unskilled workers’ – rather than a ‘skilled worker’ of a specific trade – had succeeded in striking for better pay and conditions.
The year following the matchgirls' strike saw more action by workers, including the London strike of gas workers and the London dock strike, bringing out thousands of workers. This was a significant moment in the labour movement, which has since been termed New Unionism. It was characterised by a more radical approach, greater willingness to strike, higher membership density and an appeal to a wider reach of workers outside traditional craft-based unions.
Working women and girls, some as young as 14, had started this wave of unrest and change in the labour movement.
Legacy of the strike
The matchgirl strike added to the growing public conversation around the use of white phosphorus and the practice of fining, giving the plight of workers more direct visibility. While the practice of wage docking stopped at Bryant & May after the strike, the use of white phosphorus continued.
However, by this point it had become a key concern of the Home Office. The Factories Act enabled the government to introduce special rules when it was necessary, and the continuing illness and deaths caused by phossy jaw drove the government to implement this power.
In 1893 Special Rules were introduced to 22 lucifer match factories, 18 of which were in England. These factories had to be certified, sanitation provisions provided and better ventilation introduced. Our files reveal lots of objections from factories, who felt it would be disruptive to their work and that the mandated medical examinations would be costly.
The special rules also introduced compulsory reporting of phosphorus poisoning to factory inspectors. Despite this extra regulation, the cases of phossy jaw continued to be underreported and caused controversy in the press.
Bryant & May came to the Home Office’s attention repeatedly and records show at least five deaths of factory workers from consequences of phosphorus poisoning between 1892 and 1896. Records also include a list of 11 Bryant & May employees all continuing to suffer from phossy jaw by 1898. The youngest, aged 19, had worked for five years at the factory.
Match workers also had an obligation to report health concerns. However, many feared this because if they showed symptoms, they would be forced to stop working.
Further special regulations and the Factory & Workshop Acts were introduced, offering more worker protection. However, employers could argue against special regulations through arbitration, which many match factories did. The Union of Women Match Makers became the Matchmakers' Union and in 1900 they demanded to be part of the arbitration process, arguing that workers' voices needed to be heard.
Despite all this the government were reticent to ban white phosphorus, trying to avoid overregulation of industry and recognising the economic significance of the match trade. Many of the shareholders of Bryant & May were also notable figures at the time, including politicians.
Despite the significant impact on their workers, Bryant & May continued to argue against a ban. By 1901, technological advances meant other production options were available for easy-strike matches and Bryant & May finally announced that they would no longer be using white phosphorus. A government ban followed a few years later.
The matchgirls were vital in creating visibility for the match workers’ plight. Their strike added momentum to the trade union movement and helped working class people in the East End recognise their own power to make change.
Records featured in this article
-
- From our collection
- ZPER 34/93
- Title
- Illustrated London News
- Date
- 4 August 1888
-
- From our collection
- COPY 1/401/61
- Title
- Photograph of 'The Little Match Girl'
- Date
- 1890
-
- From our collection
- COPY 1/374/382
- Title
- Photograph of Annie Besant
- Date
- 1885
-
- From our collection
- HO 46/93
- Title
- Home Office daily registers of correspondence
- Date
- May to August 1888
-
- From our collection
- HO 45/9849/B12393D
- Title
- Home office records on use of phosphorous in making lucifer matches
- Date
- 1898
-
- From our collection
- TS 18/425
- Title
- Plan of Bryant & May factory
- Date
- 1899–1900