Labelled "Rot. 13" at bottom. Portmote on Monday next [blank] the Feast of St....

Labelled "Rot. 13" at bottom.

Portmote on Monday next [blank] the Feast of St. Augustine, Bishop of the English.

Ranulf de Alretone appeared v. John Morel; and Augustine, attorney of the said John, essoined himself v. Ranulf through Richard de Stanlowe.

Margery de Hasseley appeared through Ralph Normon her attorney v. Richard le Comber. He did not come and was distrained for the second time.

Day given to Robert the Waterleader, plaintiff, and William Walran until the next court at the prayer of the parties without essoin.

Day given to the attorney of Petronilla Hachey and to the attorney of Walter de Frodisham until etc.

William Walewe and Alice his wife complained of William de Hales; plea of trespass. Pledges: William Iuvenis (plt.), who was also attorney, William le Fourbour (def.). The plaintiff came through his attorney. The pledge of the defendant was distrained for the first time.

Richard de le Mine complained of Cecilia, daughter of William le Smale; plea of trespass. Pledges: Robert Wercoc (plt.), Richard de Stanlowe (def.). The plaintiff came. The pledge of the defendant acknowledged himself to be a pledge.

Roger de Hontindon appeared through Richard Harald, his attorney, v. John de Loncastel. He did not come and was therefore distrained for the second time.

Hugh de Kelsale attached to answer Henry the Carpenter and Mageta his wife; plea of trespass. Mageta complained that on Saturday before "Haringes Sonenday" last past, when she was in her garden to drive away a little pig, the said Hugh came and made "homsokne" and outrageously insulted her, beat her, badly treated her and struck her with his fist on the forehead and drew blood, against the peace and to her damage of 20s. and more. She asked that it might be inquired that this was true. Hugh came and denied the force and said that if Magota received any harm this was by her own assault; and he asked that it should be inquired that this was true.

Margin: 12d.

Day continued between Thomas Marescall and William de Flint until the next court.

John de Lancastel put in his place Henry the Cutler in a plea of debt between him and Roger de Huntindon.

Roger de Hontindon put in his place Henry the Cutler in a plea of debt between him and John de Loncastel.

Portmote on Monday next after the Feast of the Translation of St. Thomas the Martyr.

William Walewe appeared. He was distrained for the third time.

[Blank] who was wife of Godfrey the Tailor complained of Christiana de Werintone; plea of trespass. Pledges: William de Norgate (plt.), Richard de Covintr' (def.). The plaintiff came. The pledge of the defendant acknowledged himself to be a pledge.

Thomas the Tanner complained of Margery de Bostoc for unjust detention of one pitcher. Pledges: William Iuvenis (plt.), who was also attorney, Hodde (def.).

Reginald de Lene complained of Adam de Melis that he had unjustly disseised him of his freehold in Chester, namely of free entry to and exit from his free tenement. The parties having appeared in court put themselves on the arbitration of six trust-worthy men.

At the Portmore on Monday next after the Feast of St. James the Apostle Reginald de Lene appeared v. the same Adam de Melis, saying that unjustly and against the peace of the bailiff, he disseised him of his free entry to and exit from his shop in Chester, after John the Scot was made Earl of Chester; whereof he was fully seised until Adam disseised him, to his damage of 20s. And he asked that it should be inquired by assize that this was true. Adam came and denied the force and all disseisin and loss and asked for a hearing of the plaint, which, having been heard, he denied as before. And he asked for judgment, as Henry said in his plaint that he was disseised of his freehold and put in like manner free entry to and exit from his shop; and free entry and exit non sunt nisi pendentes et necent lib ten; and free entry and exit ought to be pleaded in their nature for themselves, and a freehold in its nature for itself, and in respect thereof he asked for judgment. Judgment was deferred until Monday next after the Feast of the Assumption because the doomsmen were not informed thereof. And Reginald and Adam had the same day. On which day the parties appeared and asked for judgment and judgment was deferred until Monday after the Feast of the Beheading of St. John Baptist, and the parties had the same day. On which day the parties appeared and were reconciled.

Thomas the Tanner appeared through William Iuvenis, his attorney, v. Margery de Bostoc. She did not come and was distrained for the first time.

John Morel appeared through Augustine his attorney v. Ranulf de Alreton and Eve his wife; and he essoined himself through Richard Harald and Geoffrey Pigas.

Henry the Carpenter and Magota his wife appeared v. Hugh de Kelsale. He did not come and therefore was distrained for the first time.

William de Flint appeared v. Thomas Marescall who essoined himself through Augustine the Servant (serviens).

William Walran attached to answer Robert the Waterleader; plea of trespass and imprisonment. Robert complained that when on Saturday before the Sunday ..... [blank] he was on the service of the King keeping guard William came there and between curfew and the middle of the night beat him, badly treated him and drew blood, and afterwards brought him to prison. And he offered to him pledges, namely John the Serjeant, Richard Spilring, and others, and he did not wish to receive pledges but imprisoned him for the whole night, to his damage of 100s. He asked that it should be investigated that this was true. William denied the force and injury and asked for licence to plead. And Robert asked for judgment as if he were not opposed, saying that William had omitted omitted to deny the imprisonment in his defence. Judgment was deferred.

Day given to Richard le Comber and Margery de Asseley until etc.

Petronilla Hachey appeared through her attorney v. Walter de Frodisham, and he essoined himself through William Iuvenis.

Richard de le Mine appeared v. Cecilia le Smale. She did not come and was distrained for the first time.

John de Loncastel appeared through William Iuvenis his attorney, v. Roger de Huntindon; and he essoined himself through Henry the Cutler.

Portmote on Monday next after the Feast of St. James, Apostle.

Henry the Tailor outside the east gate complained of Roger Pigas; plea of trespass. Pledges: William Iuvenis (plt.), Richard de Nove Castre (def.).

Felicia Normon complained of Henry the Tailor; plea of trespass. Pledges: Ralph Normon (plt.), Richard the Cook (def.).

Christiana Wayot complained of William le Beremon; plea of trespass. Pledges: William Gisors (plt.), Peter de Spalding (def.). Christiana put in her place Henry le Cutiler.

Adam de Melis complained of Reginald de Lene that he took off one door and one postern and one aperture? (perietem) to the injury of his freehold, namely by taking away the light and hindering him from his house. Pledges: Richard de Hawardin (plt.), William Iuvenis (def.).

Ranulf de Alreton appeared v. John Morel; and Augustine his attorney essoined himself v. the said Ranulf through William Iuvenis.

Day given to Nicholas the chaplain, to the attorney of Walter de Frodisham and to the attorney of Petronilla Hache until etc.

William Walran appeared v. Robert the Waterleader, and he essoined himself through William servant of Hugh the Waterleader.

Alice, wife of Godfrey the Tailor, appeared v. Christiana de Werintone. She did not come and was distrained for the first time.

The pledges of Thomas the Tanner and Margery de Bostoc distrained for the first time.

The pledge of Henry the Carpenter and of his wife distrained for the first time.

The pledge of Hugh de Kelsale distrained for the second time.

The pledge of Margery de Asseley distrained.

Richard le Comber essoined himself v. the said Margery de malo lecti through Hodde.

Richard de le Milne appeared v. Cecilia le Smale. She did not come and was distrained for the second time.

Roger de Hontindon appeared through Henry the Cutler, his attorney, v. John de Lancastr'; and he essoined himself through William Iuvenis.

Henry the Tailor appeared v. Roger Pigas; and Richard de Novo castro acknowledged himself to be his pledge.

The pledge of Christiana Wayot distrained for the first time.

Peter de Spalding acknowledged himself to be the pledge of William le [Pe?r] tour.

Day given to William Swalewe and to William de Hales until the next court without essoin.

Henry the Tailor attached to answer Felicia Normon; plea of trespass. On Tuesday after the Feast of St. John Baptist in that year she had handed over to the said Henry one headdress with ...... to repair, so that she should have it on the following Thursday; which headdress was injured in his custody to her damage of 2s. and more, and in respect thereof she would bring suit. Henry came and denied the whole and waged his law.

Portmote on Monday next after the Feast of St. Peter in Chains.

Robert the Waterleader appeared v. William Walran, and he essoined himself through William Iuvenis.

The pledge of Alice, wife of Godfrey the Tailor, distrained for the first time.

The pledge of Christian de Werinton distrained for the second time.

Richard de Stanlow essoined William de Edlaston.

William Iuvenis essoined Walter de Frodisham.

Adam de Melis v. Reginald de Lene on a plea of nuisance (nocumentum) through Richard de Stanlow.

The pledge of Thomas the Tanner and Margery de Bostoc distrained for the second time.

John Morel through Augustine his attorney appeared v. Ranulf de Alreton and Eve his wife and they essoined themselves through Henry the Cutler and Geoffrey Pigas.

Day given to Margery de Asseley and Richard le Comber until etc.

Day given to William Walewe and William de Hales until etc. without essoin.

Day given to Richard de le Mine and to Cecilia le Smale until etc. without essoin.

The pledges of Henry the Tailor and of Roger Pigas distrained for the first time.

Felicia Normon appeared v. Henry the Tailor and he did not come. Therefore he was distrained for the first time after law. And Felicia put in her place Henry the Cutler.

Christiana Wayot appeared through Henry the Cutler, her attorney, v. William le Portour. He did not come and was distrained for the first time.

William de Flint appeared v. Thomas Marescall and he essoined himself through Richard de Stanlowe.

John de Loncastrel was attached to answer Roger de Huntindone on a plea of debt in which Roger, through his attorney Henry the Cutler, complained that John unjustly detained 24 silver shillings. On Wednesday before the Feast of St. Nicholas in that year John had bought from the said Roger [gap], basins(?) ..... and ..... in the house of the said Roger in Forgatestrete, to the value of 35s., 12s. to be paid at the Annunciation next following and 12s at the Nativity of St. John following to his loss of 10s. and more. And he made a tally with him, which was shown in court. If John wished to deny this Roger was ready to prove his tally. John came, through Geoffrey Pigas, and denied the force etc. and the loss and asked for judgment whether he was held to answer that plaint as he had been impleaded on another occasion for debt in the Pentice. And judgment was deferred until etc.

Adam de Melis put in his place Henry le Cotiler or Ralph Normon in a plea of novel disseisin between Reginald de Lene plt. and him.

The same Adam put in his place Henry le Cotiler or Ralph Normon to win or lose in a plea of debt between him and the same Reginald (def.) on a plea of nuisance.