Peter (Pey) de Mont Cam (Montcalm, Moncaup). de Mont Cam (Montcalm, Moncaup) Peter...

Petitioners

Peter (Pey) de Mont Cam (Montcalm, Moncaup).

Name(s)

de Mont Cam (Montcalm, Moncaup), Peter (Pey)

Addressees

King.

Nature of request

[This petition is damaged] Peter de Mont Cam makes three petitions:1) He states that he abandoned all his goods and inheritances to come into the service of the king's father in his war in Gascony, as was attested before John de Haustede, the king's Seneschal, and that in compensation for these losses, John granted him the goods of John de Boglon, by virtue of an assignment made on these goods by Edmund, late Earl of Kent, the king's uncle, then lieutenant in the Duchy of Guyenne. But now, by virtue of the treaty between the king and the King of France, all the goods of rebels who adhered to the King of France are to be returned - although he and the others in his position will not be able to recover their inheritance. He asks the king to ordain for the recovery of his goods and inheritance.2) He states that he was without any compensation for four years, before the Earl of Kent made this grant to him, and suffered great damages as a result. He asks the king to have consideration to him [and to give him some compensation].3) He requests payment of [his wages] and for horses lost in the king's service.

Nature of endorsement

[On face, to first] The king is suing to the Kign of France by treaties to recover his lands, and they are to be . . . The Seneschal and Constable are to be ordered to inform themselves . . . the services and damages . . .[To second] The deputies are to be ordered to inform themselves and to inform [the king].[To third] The Constable is to be ordered that when he has seen the bills, [he is to pay him]. [None on dorse]

Places mentioned

Gascony, [France]

Guyenne, [France].

People mentioned

[Edward II], King of England

John de Haustede, Seneschal of Gascony

John (Johan) de Boglon (Bouglon)

Edmund [of Woodstock], Earl of Kent

[Philip VI], King of France.

For another petition from the same petitioner, see SC 8/128/6352