? No Petitioner named [A series of 4 responses:]1) It is agreed that the fine on...

Petitioners

? No Petitioner named

Nature of request

[A series of 4 responses:]1) It is agreed that the fine on Mountflour's account be viewed and patents be made on what is found due on it.2) Concerning the £1,000, William Pouche is to be spoken with to know how much he wishes to charge of the sum in discharge of Mountflour, and the remainder is to be rebated on the debt that Mountflour owes the king.3) Concerning the sum paid for the archers, he should show his warrant and the letters of Dartefeld attesting the receipt and he should have an allowance.4) Concerning the acquittance it is agreed that he should have a respite until Easter, and in the meantime the chancellor and treasurer should speak with him and take information so that they are able to do what is best for the king.

Nature of endorsement

[None].

Places mentioned

Florence, [Italy].

People mentioned

Master Paul [of Monte Flor' (Mountflour)]

William Pouche of Florence

James [Dartefeld].

For another duplicate of the petition and other associated documents including a duplicate set of responses (SC 8/226/11281-5), see

For a duplicate of the petition to which this is a set of responses for, see SC 8/194/9679

For an account of the petitioner for the great and small crowns, see E 101/390/6

For a mandate to the Chancellor, Treasurer and Bartholomew Burghassh (Burghersh) to put into execution the enclosed bill of Paul de Mounteflour for the deliverance of the jewels pledged overseas, see no.14483 of C 81/280

For a related document, see no.18852 in C 81/324

For the petition to which these are the responses, see SC 8/228/11363 SC 8/226/11281