Piece
Transferred to SC 5/8/6 and subsequently to C 47/8/1
Catalogue reference: SC 5/8/7
Transferred to SC 5/8/6 and subsequently to C 47/8/1
Item
John de Ifeld, knight de Ifeld John King and council John de Ifeld states that the...
Catalogue reference: SC 8/54/2651
What’s it about?
This record is about the John de Ifeld, knight de Ifeld John King and council John de Ifeld states that the... dating from [1333] in the series Special Collections: Ancient Petitions. It is held at The National Archives, Kew.
Is it available online?
Yes, this record is available online and can be downloaded. How to view it.
Can I see it in person?
No, this record is not available to see in person at The National Archives. Other ways to view it.
Full description and record details
-
Reference (The unique identifier to the record described, used to order and refer to it)
- SC 8/54/2651
-
Date (When the record was created)
- [1333]
-
Description (What the record is about)
-
- Petitioners
- John de Ifeld, knight
- Name(s)
- de Ifeld, John
- Addressees
- King and council
- Nature of request
- John de Ifeld states that the manor of Gomshall in Surrey, which is held of him, was taken into the king's hand because of the outlawry of Roger Sauvage, who held it, and granted to John de Pulteney to hold at his pleasure. After the king had had the year, day and waste, John de Ifeld sued to have delivery of it, but John de Pulteney has purchased a supersedeas to obstruct this delivery. He requests a writ of sicut alias to the Sheriff of Surrey, to give him seisin notwithstanding this supersedeas.
- Nature of endorsement
- [None]
- Places mentioned
- Gomshall, Surrey
- Nottinghamshire
- London
- People mentioned
- Roger Sauvage (Savage), tenant of Gomshall
- Richard de Grey, justice
- Ambrose de Noveu Leu
- William de Weston
- William Vaghan (Vaughan), formerly Sheriff of Surrey
- John de Pulteney of London
-
Note (Additional information about the record)
- CCR 1333-7 p.10 is dated at York, 30 January 1333, and p.146 is dated at Hereford, 25 October 1333. The petition was clearly presented between these two dates.CCR 1330-3 p.436 is dated at Waltham, 20 February 1332. CCR 1330-3 p.515 (the original order for delivery of the manor) is dated at Beverley, 1 January 1333, and CCR 1330-3 p.520 is dated at Beverley, 3 January 1333.The commission for CMI 1307-49 no.1209 is dated at Clarendon, 2 December 5 Edward III (1331), and the assessment took place on the morrow of St Thomas the Apostle: which agrees with the petitioner's claim that this inquisition was returned in Chancery around the octaves of St Hilary in that year.The writ to hold the inquisition in CMI 1307-49 no.1280 is dated at York, 15 December 6 Edward III (1332), and the inquisition was held on the morrow of St Thomas the martyr.Unfortunately the date of piece 109 of SC 1/39 can no longer be read.However, William Vaghan appears to have been Sheriff of Surrey between 19 November 1331 and 8 March 1334: which does not fit in with the petition, which seems to suggest that he is no longer Sheriff.
-
Related material (A cross-reference to other related records)
-
Instructions to issue the writ to the Sheriff are piece 109 in SC 1/39
-
Held by (Who holds the record)
- The National Archives, Kew
-
Former department reference (Former identifier given by the originating creator)
- Parliamentary Petition 4602
-
Legal status (A note as to whether the record being described is a Public Record or not)
- Public Record(s)
-
Language (The language of the record)
- French
-
Closure status (Whether the record is ‘open’ (available to the public) or ‘closed’ (not available due to a legal exemption))
- Open Document, Open Description
-
Publication note(s) (A note of publications related to the record)
-
- Calendar of Close Rolls, Edw III, vol. II, 1330-1333, (Public Record Office, 1898), pp.436 (order to John de Pulteney to pay John de Ifeld the sum due for the manor of Gomshall, with arrears) & 515 (order to the Sheriff of Surrey to deliver the manor of Gomshall to John de Ifeld) & 520 (order to John de Pulteney not to intermeddle further with the manor for this reason)
- Calendar of Close Rolls, Edw III, vol. III, 1333-1337, (Public Record Office, 1898), pp.10 (order to the Sheriff of Surrey not to deliver the manor of Gomshall to John de Ifeld, and to John de Pulteney to retain it in his keeping) & 146 (order to deliver the manor of John de Ifeld)
- Calendar of Inquisitions Miscellaneous, vol. II, Edw II - 22 Edw III, (Public Record Office, 1916), no.1209 (commission to Ambrose de Noveu Leu and William de Weston to assess the value of the manor of Gomshall) & no.1280 (inquisition finding that the manor of Gomshall has been in the king's hand since 2 December 5 Edward III [1331])
-
Record URL
- https://beta.nationalarchives.gov.uk/catalogue/id/C9062867/
How to order it
- View this record page in our current catalogue
- Check viewing and downloading options
- Select an option and follow instructions
Series information
SC 8
Special Collections: Ancient Petitions
See the series level description for more information about this record.
Catalogue hierarchy
Over 27 million records
This record is held at The National Archives, Kew
74,884 records
Within the department: SC
Records of various departments, arranged artificially according to type, and formerly...
18,283 records
Within the series: SC 8
Special Collections: Ancient Petitions
52 records
Within the piece: SC 8/54
2651-2700. Individual petitions are described , dated, and are available at item...
You are currently looking at the item: SC 8/54/2651
John de Ifeld, knight de Ifeld John King and council John de Ifeld states that the...
Related records
Records that share similar topics with this record.