Skip to main content
Service phase: Beta

This is a new way to search our records, which we're still working on. Alternatively you can search our existing catalogue, Discovery.

Piece

Short Title: Hexte v Rich. [Cause code: SCEL-06988]. Documents: bill, answer/s, commission,...

Catalogue reference: STAC 5/H68/39

What’s it about?

This record is about the Short Title: Hexte v Rich. [Cause code: SCEL-06988]. Documents: bill, answer/s, commission,... dating from 1584 Nov 17-1585 Nov 16 in the series Court of Star Chamber: Proceedings, Elizabeth I. It is held at The National Archives, Kew.

Is it available online?

No, this record is not available online. However, you can order a copy. Other ways to view it.

Can I see it in person?

Yes, this record is held at The National Archives and is available to see in person. How to view it.

Full description and record details

Reference
STAC 5/H68/39
Date
1584 Nov 17-1585 Nov 16
Description

Short Title: Hexte v Rich. [Cause code: SCEL-06988].

Documents: bill, answer/s, commission, interrogatories, depositions [also includes an answer from STAC 5/H64/2, SC-EL13220].

Plaintiffs: Edward Hexte of Devon.

Defendants: William Ryche, William Brode and others.

County: Cornwall.

Subject: [tithes in the parishes of St Enoder, St Columb, and Crantock: see also depositions in Rich v Hext, 1590, E 134/32Eliz/East22, where they are claimed by Rich in the right of his wife].

Regnal year: 27 Eliz I. Case report, taken from Star Chamber Reports, BL Harley MS 2143, ed K. J. Kesselring (List and Index Society, Special Series 57, 2018): [631] Hext, plaintiff; Rich, defendant: for forgery and other misdemeanors, witnesses examined before the mayor and burgesses of Bodmin touching the forgery in this court on the defendant’s behalf which the court much misliked and therefore granted process against the mayor to answer his misdemeanor. Trinity 26 Elizabeth fo. 20. [677] Hext, plaintiff; Andrews, mayor of Bodmin, Walker town clerk there, Sandy and Stubbs two burgesses of the same town, William Rich et al: that Walker knowing that Rich was of lewd behaviour and that the plaintiff made title to the [Sarbes? {tithes ?}] of the parish and that he meant to encumber the plaintiff’s title to the same and to that purpose in the presence of the said mayor took the depositions of 14 persons whom he knew not ready written tending altogether to the impeachment of the plaintiff’s title without any bill, plaint or action exhibited in the said town’s court which depositions by the procurement of the said Rich he caused to be exemplified under the town seal and very falsely and indirectly to be certified under the hands of the said mayor and the two other burgesses for which they were committed and fined 2 at £40 apiece and other two at £30 apiece. Trinity 28 Elizabeth fo. 254 [note: folio references are to the lost Star Chamber decree and order entry books].

Held by
The National Archives, Kew
Legal status
Public Record(s)
Closure status
Open Document, Open Description
Record URL
https://beta.nationalarchives.gov.uk/catalogue/id/C5405174/

How to order it

  1. View this record page in our current catalogue
  2. Check viewing and downloading options
  3. Select an option and follow instructions

Series information

STAC 5

Court of Star Chamber: Proceedings, Elizabeth I

See the series level description for more information about this record.

View series description

Catalogue hierarchy

Over 27 million records

This record is held at The National Archives, Kew

57,502 records

Within the department: STAC

Records of the Court of Star Chamber and of other courts

38,759 records

Within the series: STAC 5

Court of Star Chamber: Proceedings, Elizabeth I

You are currently looking at the piece: STAC 5/H68/39

Short Title: Hexte v Rich. [Cause code: SCEL-06988]. Documents: bill, answer/s, commission,...

Related records

Records that share similar topics with this record.