Short title: Attryeth v Coates. Plaintiff(s): Thomas Attryeth and his wife Jane....

Short title: Attryeth v Coates.

Plaintiff(s): Thomas Attryeth and his wife Jane.

Defendant(s): Robert Coates and his wife Elizabeth.

Subject of depositions: Manor of Putham in Mattingley, in Southampton, and a copyhold tenement therein called "Gunters" lately belonging to Christopher Goodchild, the elder, Touching the surrender of said tenement to Elizabeth the then wife of said Christopher (the now wife of the defendant). Whether there was a proviso or condition in said surrender that said Elizabeth should pay out of the surrendered premises during her life the sum of five pounds per annum, and to whom? Whether to Christopher Goodchild, the younger, (plaintiff Jane's late husband), and his executors or administrators, or if the said words "ex'ors or adm'ors" were left out of said surrender, was it so done by any directions of said Christopher Goodchild the elder, or were those words omitted by the negligence of the clerk that wrote the same surrender, and contrary to the intention of the said Chrsr. Goodchild, the elder? etc. Customs of said manor, etc.

County/place: Hampshire.

Date of commission: 19 June 1689.

Additional information: interrogatories and depositions taken 28 September 1689 at Crookham.

Deponent(s): John Barrett (2); Edward Woodhouse (2); William Taylor.