Piece
Now (with E 134/MISC/1926) E 134/1Geo2/East4
Catalogue reference: E 134/MISC/721
Now (with E 134/MISC/1926) E 134/1Geo2/East4
Piece
Catalogue reference: E 134/3Jas2/Mich32
This record is about the Short title: Godolphin v Ustick. Plaintiff(s): William Godolphin. Defendant(s): Richart... dating from 1687 Oct 24-1687 Nov 28 in the series Exchequer: King's Remembrancer: Depositions taken by Commission. It is held at The National Archives, Kew.
No, this record is not available online. However, you can order a copy. Other ways to view it.
Yes, this record is held at The National Archives and is available to see in person. How to view it.
Short title: Godolphin v Ustick.
Plaintiff(s): William Godolphin.
Defendant(s): Richart Ustick, merchant.
Subject of depositions: Town and borough of Penzance (Cornwall), and the mills there called "Tolcarne Mills." Touching the custom of "suit and service" to the mills (i.e. grinding corn, etc.). Also touching an alleged contempt of court committed by defendant in disregarding and disobeying a decree of the Court of Exchequer (dated 12 Chas I Easter) made in the suit of William Godolphin, plaintiff, and William Madderne, mayor of the town of Penzance (Cornwall), Roger Polkinghorne, AnthonyGubbs, William Noseworthy, and others (then aldermen of the town), and Pascow Ellis and others, tenants and inhabitants there, defendants, by which decree it was ordered that the defendants, and all other the tenants, burgesses, and inhabitants of and within the borough, should grind all their corn, grain, and malt at the plaintiff's mills called "Tolcarne Mills" and not elsewhere, except so much of their malt as Tolcarne Mills could not dispatch to be ground at Cornkey Mill in the decree mentioned, and that none of the defendants, nor any other tenant or inhabitant there whatsoever, should thereafter erect or cause to be erected or sett up any querne hand mill, horse mill, or malt mill in or within the boro'. Nor should make any unlawful order or orders or do any other act or acts whatsoever, whereby the suit of mill to the plaintiff's mills should or might be withdrawn, or in prejudice to the plaintiff's mills.
County/place: Cornwall.
Date of commission: 15 June 1687.
Additional information: interrogatories and depositions taken 16 August 1687 at Helston and 17 August 1687 at Pauil.
Deponent(s): William Nicolls; John Harry; William Drake; Walter Humfry; John Row (2); James Corey; John Tremenhere; Thomas Eastlack; Thomas Benmer; William Rawlings; Phillip Harris; Thomas Burch.
E 134
See the series level description for more information about this record.
Short title: Godolphin v Ustick. Plaintiff(s): William Godolphin. Defendant(s): Richart...
Records that share similar topics with this record.