Piece
See C 202/224/1 - C 202/224/26
Catalogue reference: C 202/224
See C 202/224/1 - C 202/224/26
Piece
Catalogue reference: C 202/258/6
This record is about the Kent - Baker v Nightingale, Cox v Austen, Doe v Read, Ison v Vacher, Manley v Page,... dating from 1738 in the series Chancery: Petty Bag Office: Writ Files. It is held at The National Archives, Kew.
No, this record is not available online. However, you can order a copy. Other ways to view it.
Yes, this record is held at The National Archives and is available to see in person. How to view it.
Kent - Baker v Nightingale, Cox v Austen, Doe v Read, Ison v Vacher, Manley v Page, Marlow v Powell, Perry v White, Smith v Allen, Squire v Goldsmith, Steven v Cresswell, Stoddard v Runnidge, West v Raymond, Williamson v Hodsoll; Leicester - Grew v Jarvis, Harriman v Hind, Lilley v Dodson; Lincoln - Barthropp v Foster, Barthropp v Pindar, Bell v Howson, Buckles v Wray, Burton v Clarke, Burton v Essington, Clarke v Chapman, Clay v Gibbs, Clipsham v Watson, Dobson v Wigglesworth, Doe v Lister, Fairfax v Wallis, Gangate v Smith, Harrison v Thorpe, Haynes v Paul, Heardsley v Pattener, Howson v Robinson, Hunter v Brooks, Ivatts v Thomson, Jackson v Wills, Jarvas v Robinson, Meads v Lugg, Messinger v Jesper, Morrice v Maw, Pinkerton v Chamberlaine, Portwood v Dyer, Robinson v Wood, Robinson v Bemrose, Seymour v Ashwell, Turpin v Tomlinson, Wickham v Davis.
C 202
See the series level description for more information about this record.
Kent - Baker v Nightingale, Cox v Austen, Doe v Read, Ison v Vacher, Manley v Page,...
Records that share similar topics with this record.