Record revealed
Letters from the curator of St Vincent Botanic Gardens
Discover how plants travelled across the British Empire in the 19th century and the effect this has on our natural environment, and eating habits, today.
Piece
Bolles v Ayscough, dated 1682-84. see also DEL 8/74 Boor v Colman and Radley, dated...
Catalogue reference: DEL 2/12
What’s it about?
This record is about the Bolles v Ayscough, dated 1682-84. see also DEL 8/74 Boor v Colman and Radley, dated... dating from 1649-1838 in the series Registrar of the High Court of Delegates and of the High Court of Admiralty: Cause.... It is held at The National Archives, Kew.
Access information is unavailable
Sorry, information for accessing this record is currently unavailable online. Please try again later.
Full description and record details
-
Reference (The unique identifier to the record described, used to order and refer to it)
- DEL 2/12
-
Date (When the record was created)
- 1649-1838
-
Description (What the record is about)
-
- Bolles v Ayscough, dated 1682-84. see also DEL 8/74
- Boor v Colman and Radley, dated 1745-46.
- Booth v Molyneux, dated 1789.
- Bor v Smith, dated 1721-22.
- Boteler v Boteler, dated 1673. see also DEL 8/74
- Boughton v York, dean and chapter of, dated 1716. see also DEL 8/74
- Bovey v South et al, dated 1649.
- Bowen v Bowen alias David, dated 1702-03.
- Bowerbank v Jamaica, Bishop of, dated 1838.
- Bowerman v Frist, dated 1789.
- Bowers v Bowers, dated 1715.
- Bowes v Bowes, dated 1787-88.
- Bowes v Strathmore, dated 1790.
- Bowles et al. v St Davids, bishop of, dated 1730.
- Bowrey v Rutter et al, dated c 1654. see also DEL 8/74
- Bowyer v Annesley, dated 1790.
- Boyd v Boyd, dated 1831.
- Box v Chambers, dated 1650.
- Bradenham v Admiral, dated 1704-05.
- Bradley v Bradley, dated 1678.
- Bradshaw v Crowder, dated 1738.
- Bradshaw v Weston, dated 1702.
- Brand v Bird, dated 1666.
- Bray v Skipwith, dated 1675.
- [Brent, Nathaniel, deceased], dated 1690.
- Brereton v Lane, dated 1705-07.
- Brett v Applebury, dated 1704.
- Brett v Brett, dated 1826. See also DEL 2/14
- Brideoak v Chichester, bishop of, dated 1682. see also DEL 8/74
- Bridgen v Bellmont, dated 1741.
- Bridges v Newcastle, dated 1712.
- Bright v Sping, dated 1675.
- Brisco v Brisco, dated 1819-26. See also DEL 2/14
- Britland v Carte, dated 1737.
- Bromer v Bromer, dated 1800.
- Bromley v Bromley, dated 1793-94.
In two boxes.
-
Held by (Who holds the record)
- The National Archives, Kew
-
Legal status (A note as to whether the record being described is a Public Record or not)
- Public Record(s)
-
Closure status (Whether the record is ‘open’ (available to the public) or ‘closed’ (not available due to a legal exemption))
- Open Document, Open Description
-
Subjects (Categories and themes found in our collection (our subject list is under development, and some records may have no subjects or fewer than expected))
-
Record URL
- https://beta.nationalarchives.gov.uk/catalogue/id/C3540881/
Series information
DEL 2
Registrar of the High Court of Delegates and of the High Court of Admiralty: Cause...
See the series level description for more information about this record.
Catalogue hierarchy
Over 27 million records
This record is held at The National Archives, Kew
3,021 records
Within the department: DEL
Records of the High Court of Delegates
172 records
Within the series: DEL 2
Registrar of the High Court of Delegates and of the High Court of Admiralty: Cause...
You are currently looking at the piece: DEL 2/12
Bolles v Ayscough, dated 1682-84. see also DEL 8/74 Boor v Colman and Radley, dated...
You may be interested in
-
-
Focus on
Smuggling gangs and coastal policing in 19th-century England
Following the Napoleonic Wars, smuggling became a major concern for the British government. -
Record revealed
Report on the British Indian Army, 1943
This Second World War War Office document assessed the British Indian Army's battle readiness and made recommendations for its development.
Related records
Records that share similar topics with this record.