Focus on
Smuggling gangs and coastal policing in 19th-century England
Following the Napoleonic Wars, smuggling became a major concern for the British government.
Piece
Arnold v Holles, dated 1663. Arthur v Arthur, dated 1720. Arthur v Law and Dunkin,...
Catalogue reference: DEL 2/4
What’s it about?
This record is about the Arnold v Holles, dated 1663. Arthur v Arthur, dated 1720. Arthur v Law and Dunkin,... dating from 1654-1827 in the series Registrar of the High Court of Delegates and of the High Court of Admiralty: Cause.... It is held at The National Archives, Kew.
Is it available online?
No, this record is not available online. However, you can order a copy. Other ways to view it.
Can I see it in person?
Yes, this record is held at The National Archives and is available to see in person. How to view it.
Full description and record details
-
Reference (The unique identifier to the record described, used to order and refer to it)
- DEL 2/4
-
Date (When the record was created)
- 1654-1827
-
Description (What the record is about)
-
- Arnold v Holles, dated 1663.
- Arthur v Arthur, dated 1720.
- Arthur v Law and Dunkin, dated 1667.
- Ash v Ash, dated 1708.
- Ash v Williams and Smith, dated 1685.
- Ashdown v Edmead, dated 1685.
- Ashton v Noden, dated 1705-06.
- Askew v all persons, dated 1780.
- Ast v Mayafee, dated 1796-97.
- Atfen v Atfen, dated 1705. see also DEL 8/74
- Astry v Duncombe, dated 1678. see also DEL 8/74
- Atkinson v Atkinson, dated 1825-27. see also DEL 2/5
- Atkinson v Barwick, dated 1699.
- The Atlas, i.e. (Fletcher et al. v Chalmers and Fletcher et al. v Inglis and Spankie), dated 1827. See also box 5 below
- Attwood v Eyre, dated 1730-40.
- Atwater and Bruce v Clewer, dated [no date].
- Atwill v Buller, dated 1705.
- Austin v Cock, dated 1722.
- [Awdeley Family Leases and Papers], dated c 1661. see also DEL 8/74
- Ayliffe v Ayliffe, dated 1680.
- Aylmer v Annesley, dated 1791-92.
- Ayres v Hedges, dated 1654.
-
Held by (Who holds the record)
- The National Archives, Kew
-
Legal status (A note as to whether the record being described is a Public Record or not)
- Public Record(s)
-
Closure status (Whether the record is ‘open’ (available to the public) or ‘closed’ (not available due to a legal exemption))
- Open Document, Open Description
-
Subjects (Categories and themes found in our collection (our subject list is under development, and some records may have no subjects or fewer than expected))
-
Record URL
- https://beta.nationalarchives.gov.uk/catalogue/id/C3540873/
How to order it
- View this record page in our current catalogue
- Check viewing and downloading options
- Select an option and follow instructions
Series information
DEL 2
Registrar of the High Court of Delegates and of the High Court of Admiralty: Cause...
See the series level description for more information about this record.
Catalogue hierarchy
Over 27 million records
This record is held at The National Archives, Kew
3,021 records
Within the department: DEL
Records of the High Court of Delegates
172 records
Within the series: DEL 2
Registrar of the High Court of Delegates and of the High Court of Admiralty: Cause...
You are currently looking at the piece: DEL 2/4
Arnold v Holles, dated 1663. Arthur v Arthur, dated 1720. Arthur v Law and Dunkin,...
You may be interested in
-
-
Record revealed
Report on the British Indian Army, 1943
This Second World War War Office document assessed the British Indian Army's battle readiness and made recommendations for its development. -
Record revealed
List of HMS Victory's killed and wounded at the Battle of Trafalgar
We hold one of the lesser known records from the Battle of Trafalgar, the Surgeon’s journal for HMS Victory by William Beatty.
Related records
Records that share similar topics with this record.