File
Admiralty Jurisdiction
Catalogue reference: IOR/H/410
What’s it about?
This record is a file about the Admiralty Jurisdiction dating from 1785-1794.
Access information is unavailable
Sorry, information for accessing this record is currently unavailable online. Please try again later.
Full description and record details
-
Reference (The unique identifier to the record described, used to order and refer to it)
- IOR/H/410
-
Title (The name of the record)
- Admiralty Jurisdiction
-
Date (When the record was created)
- 1785-1794
-
Description (What the record is about)
-
(1) pp. 1-3, Memorandum on the Incompetency of the Admiralty Jurisdiction in Bengal, Signed S. J. 12th Oct. 1785. (2) pp. 5-6, F. Russell to John Smith 21st Nov. 1786 to expedite preparation of the Charter of Justice for Madras and the Commission of Admiralty for Bengal. (3) pp. 9-20, Copy of Commission for trying Pirates at Fort Marlborough 11th June 1787, docketted as Draft Commission of Admiralty for Fort William in Bengal. (4) pp. 25-54, Case for the East India Company, Opinions of George Rous, R. P. Arden (Attorney-General), and A. Macdonald (Solicitor-General) 24th March 1789 as to power of the Crown to delegate certain authorities to the Governor-General in Council and to the Governor of Madras. (5) pp. 60-128, Report concerning the Admiralty Jurisdiction in India and the proposed Commission for granting Letters of Marque by the Government there and trying Prize Causes, Prepared for Mr. Anstruther (Standing Counsel to the Board); pp. 129-221, Appendix, including printed copies of, pp. 147-52, Standing Interrogatories to be administered to Commanders, &c. of Vessels seized as Prizes by King's ships or ships with Letters of Marque, and, pp. 191-221, Amended copy of Bill for the encouragement of seamen, &c. 1793. See H/372 (2) above. (6) pp. 225-8, Mr. Cottrell to Dundas 16th April--(Original), Erection of Admiralty Courts in India. (7) pp. 229-47, Correspondence and legal opinions as to establishment of Admiralty Jurisdiction in India, Sir William Scott (King's Advocate), John Scott (Attorney-General), John Mitford (Solicitor-General), William Battine (Advocate of the Admiralty), Thomas Brodrick (Counsel for Admiralty), and Philip Stephens December 1793 to January 1794.
-
Held by (Who holds the record)
- British Library: Asian and African Studies
-
Former department reference (Former identifier given by the originating creator)
- Q/ISC/45
-
Legal status (A note as to whether the record being described is a Public Record or not)
- Public Record(s)
-
Language (The language of the record)
- English
-
Physical description (The amount and form of the record)
- 1 volume
-
Access conditions (Information on conditions that restrict or affect access to the record)
-
Unrestricted
-
Record URL
- https://beta.nationalarchives.gov.uk/catalogue/id/7dac8bf4-134a-4bbc-8e83-bf5c716db8c0/
Series information
IOR/H/402-407
Correspondence and papers concerning private trade with India
See the series level description for more information about this record.
Catalogue hierarchy
This record is held at British Library: Asian and African Studies
Within the fonds: IOR/H
Home Miscellaneous
Within the series: IOR/H/402-407
Correspondence and papers concerning private trade with India
You are currently looking at the file: IOR/H/410
Admiralty Jurisdiction