Skip to main content
Service phase: Beta

This is a new way to search our records, which we're still working on. Alternatively you can search our existing catalogue, Discovery.

File

Brief prepared by Mr. Lipscombe of Alresford for Mr. Minchin in case Harris v. Tubb...

Catalogue reference: Q22/1/2/250

What’s it about?

This record is a file about the Brief prepared by Mr. Lipscombe of Alresford for Mr. Minchin in case Harris v. Tubb... dating from 1817.

Access information is unavailable

Sorry, information for accessing this record is currently unavailable online. Please try again later.

Full description and record details

Reference
Q22/1/2/250
Title
Brief prepared by Mr. Lipscombe of Alresford for Mr. Minchin in case Harris v. Tubb to oppose the discharge of the defendant out of custody in a case of debt and false pretences, Midsummer 1817. Plaintiff had sold the defendant goods to be delivered at Farnham Wharf, but was never paid. Similar experience had happened to Thomas Herrett of Farnham, Surrey, miller
Date
1817
Held by
Hampshire Archives and Local Studies
Language
English
Record URL
https://beta.nationalarchives.gov.uk/catalogue/id/7bb24dd6-908c-483c-987d-6c07c6250383/

Series information

Q22/1

Land tax records

See the series level description for more information about this record.

View series description

Catalogue hierarchy

69,911 records

This record is held at Hampshire Archives and Local Studies

4,789 records

Within the fonds: Q

Hampshire Quarter Sessions

3,024 records

Within the sub-fonds: Q

Records of enrolment, registration and deposit

691 records

Within the sub-sub-fonds: Q22

Parliamentary elections

635 records

Within the series: Q22/1

Land tax records

124 records

Within the sub-series: Q22/1/2

Land Tax Miscellanea

You are currently looking at the file: Q22/1/2/250

Brief prepared by Mr. Lipscombe of Alresford for Mr. Minchin in case Harris v. Tubb to oppose the discharge of the defendant out of custody in a case of debt and false pretences, Midsummer 1817. Plaintiff had sold the defendant goods to be delivered at Farnham Wharf, but was never paid. Similar experience had happened to Thomas Herrett of Farnham, Surrey, miller